Case studies, held to the same standard we sell.
Proof over
promises.
We tell clients that AI engines cite evidence, not adjectives. The same rule applies to us. This page holds our client work as it clears the publication bar below; nothing here will ever be estimated, reconstructed, or borrowed.
Where the case studies are
None are published yet. That's the standard working, not the absence of work.
Aivium Digital launched in 2026, and a case study worth reading needs three things that only time and permission produce: a preserved baseline, a measured result, and a client's approval to publish both. Engagements are underway; their studies appear here when the numbers are real and released. In the meantime, our approach is documented in the open on theprocess page and inSignals, where every claim carries a source.
The publication bar
Every study that appears on this page will include all of the following. If a section can't be filled honestly, the study waits.
The situation, verifiably
Client name or an approved anonymized descriptor, industry, company stage, the problem in their words, and the baseline metrics recorded before we changed anything.
The work, specifically
Strategy, what was actually built or published, the timeline it happened on, and the constraints we worked inside. No "proprietary methodology" hand-waving.
The results, with receipts
Measured outcomes against the baseline, screenshots or artifacts where permissions allow, and a client quote only when the client approved it.
The limitations, honestly
Confounding factors, seasonality, what didn't work, and what we'd do differently. A case study without a limitations section is an ad.
Want evidence in the meantime?
Start with a discovery call: if we work together, the first deliverable is a real baseline of where AI engines mention you today, the "before" that every published result gets measured against.
Want to be the first study on this page?Start with the baseline.
Book a discovery call- 30 minutes
- Free
- No deck
- No obligation